High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 12 JH CK 0011

Commissioner of Income Tax, Central Revenue Building vs Bihar Foundry and Castings Ltd.

Jharkhand High Court · Decided on 23 December 2010 · Citation: (2011) 336 ITR 387

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bhagwati Prasad, C.J · Dilip kumar sinha, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Tax Appeal No. 41 of 2001

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 314 words
1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The issue involved in these appeals is whether the circular issued by the State of Bihar in relation to the scheme for deferred payment of the Sales Tax would be valid for the purposes of giving concession to the assesses u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act. The Tribunal has concluded in favour of the Assessees observing that the circular issued by the State Government will be sufficient to cover the case for deduction u/s 43B of the Income Tax Act.

3.

Learned Counsel for the Assessee drew attention of the Court to the circular No. 674 dated 29th December, 1993, issued by the C.B.D.T. This circular clearly enunciates that any deferment scheme, if is in conformity with the State law. then the same would be covered by the aforesaid circular and such accommodation would be available to the Assessee.

4.

The Tribunal has upheld the order of the C.I.T. which found that the implication of 43B of the Income Tax Act having been imported in the case of Assessee no illegality has been committed.

5.

In our considered view, the language used in the circular, referred to here-in-above, clearly makes out a case where such concession was available to the Assessees and as such, deferred payment of Sales Tax would be deemed to be a loan which was paid subsequently and in that view of the matter, the deduction was held permissible. Arguments of the learned Counsel that there is no such law and no amendment in the Sales Tax Act of the State of Bihar has been made, is not acceptable because the C.B.D.T. itself, in the circular aforesaid, has accepted that by circular such concession can be allowed. In that view of the matter, we do not find any force in these appeals. These appeals are. therefore, held meritless and are dismissed.