Supreme CourtFull Bench(2009) 12 SC CK 0011

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bhopal vs H.E.G. Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 December 2009 · Citation: (2010) 228 CTR 495 : (2010) 189 TAXMAN 335

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, J · H.L. Dattu, J · Deepak Verma, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No''s. 8176, 8177 and 8178 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 587 words
1.

Mr. Ajay Vohra, Learned Counsel, appears for the Respondent-assessee.

2.

Delay condoned in SLP (C) No. CC 10437/2009.

Leave granted.

3.

In income tax matters, it is well-settled that if the question is not properly framed, then, at times, confusion arises resulting in wrong answers. The present batch of Civil Appeals is an illustration of the proposition mentioned hereinabove.

4.

In the synopsis to the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 18045/2009, the question raised by the Department is whether the Assessee was entitled to claim interest on interest under the provisions of Section 244A of the income tax Act, 1961. In our view, on facts, the question framed was totally erroneous.

5.

Annexure P-1 is income tax Computation in Civil appeal arising from SLP (C) No. 18045/2009. On going through the Computation, we find that during the assessment year 1993-1994, the amount paid by the Assessee towards TDS was Rs. 45,73,528. The Tax paid after Original assessment was Rs. 1,71,00,320. The total of TDS amounting to Rs. 45,73,528 plus Tax paid after Original assessment of Rs. 1,71,00,320 stood at Rs. 2,16,73,848. In other words, the total tax paid had two components, viz., TDS + Tax paid after Original assessment. The Respondent was entitled to the refund of Rs. 2,16,73,848 (consisting of Rs. 1,71,00,320 and Rs. 45,73,528 which payment was made after 57 months and which is the only item in dispute) .

6.

The Assessee claimed statutory interest for delayed refund of Rs. 45,73,528 for 57 months between 1-4-1993 and 31-12-1997 in terms of Section 244A of the income tax Act. Therefore, this is not a case where the Assessee is claiming compound interest or interest on interest as is sought to be made out in the civil appeals filed by the Department.

7.

The next question which we are required to answer is - What is the meaning of the words "refund of any amount becomes due to the Assessee" in Section 244A? In the present case, as stated above, there are two components of the tax paid by the Assessee for which the Assessee was granted Refund, namely TDS of Rs. 45,73,528 and Tax paid after Original assessment of Rs. 1,71,00,320. The Department contends that the words "any amount" will not include the Interest which accrued to the Respondent for not refunding Rs. 45,73,528 for 57 months. We see no merit in this argument. The interest component will partake of the character of the "amount due" u/s 244A. It becomes an integral part of Rs. 45,73,528 which is not paid for 57 months after the said amount became due and payable. As can be seen from the facts narrated above, this is the case of short payment by the Department and it is in this way that the Assessee claims interest u/s 244A of the income tax Act. Therefore, on both the aforestated grounds, we are of the view that the Assessee was entitled to interest for 57 months on Rs. 45,73,528. The principal amount of Rs. 45,73,528 has been paid on 31-12-1997 but net of interest which, as stated above, partook the character of "amount due" u/s 244A.

8.

For the aforestated reasons, the Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No. 18045/2008 filed by the Department fails and is dismissed, with no order as to costs.

9.

In view of the above Order, Civil Appeals arising out of SLP (C) Nos. 18046/2009 and CC No. 10437/2009, filed by the Department, are also dismissed, with no order as to costs.