High CourtsDivision Bench(2000) 08 BOM CK 0052

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Win Laboratories P. Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 22 August 2000 · Citation: (2002) 174 CTR 512 : (2002) 254 ITR 187 : (2002) 125 TAXMAN 371

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, J · J.N. Patel, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Appeal No. 93 of 1999

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 194 words
1.

In this appeal we are concerned with the assessment year 1988-89. The Ratlam unit of the company manufactured bulk drugs which were sold to the Generic Division. The latter division prepared drugs formulations. The Rat-lam unit sold the goods to the Generic Division at market value. The Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax valued them at cost. The Assessing Officer/Commissioner of Income Tax accordingly found that deductions were wrongly inflated by the company. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reversed the decision. Hence, this appeal. In this connection, it was argued by the Department that the Assessing Officer has invoked Section 80HH(7).

2.

We do not find merit in the above contentions. Section 80HH(7) has no application. It does not deal with intra-unit transfer. The Assessing Officer has not invoked Section 80HH(7). Moreover, Section 80HH(6) directs the Assessing Officer to value the goods at market value. This has been done by the company. Here the company has not inflated the deduction u/s 80HH. Moreover, in this case the total deduction claimed by the company is Rs. 91,938. The Assessing Officer granted deductions of Rs. 61,844. Hence, the appeal is dismissed. No costs.