Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 12 SC CK 0029

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sundaram Spinning Mills

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 5 December 2000 · Citation: (2001) 249 ITR 213

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. K. Sabharwal, J · S. P. Bharucha, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal 2498 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

This is an appeal by the Revenue against the judgment and order of the High Court at Madras (see Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Sundaram Spinning Mills and Others, . The High Court answered in the affirmative and in favour of the assessee, the following question (page 215):

"Whether, the Appellate Tribunal is correct and justified in law in holding that the expression 'an assessment' to be made u/s 143(3), used in Section 144B, is confined only to the assessment to be made u/s 143 and does not cover reassessment to be made u/s 147 of the income tax Act with the consequence that the procedure prescribed u/s 144B and extended time limit provided in the Explanation to Section 153(1) is not available to reassessment to be made u/s 147 ?"

2.

The identical issue was raised before this court in the case of R. Dalmia and Another Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, , and, following that judgment, the judgment and order of the High Court must be reversed and the question answered in the negative and in favour of the Revenue. Order on the appeal accordingly. No order as to costs.