High CourtsFull Bench(2003) 06 MP CK 0001

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Smt. Shreenbai

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 24 June 2003 · Citation: (2004) 134 TAXMAN 681

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.K. Seth, J · Deepak Verma, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Appeal No. 2 of 2003 & IT Appeal No. 2 of 2003 24 June 2003

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 240 words

Heard on admission.

2.

This is an appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as ''the Act'') at the instance of the revenue against the order dated 27-3-2002 passed by the Income Tax Tribunal, Indore Bench, Indore, whereby the application preferred by respondent-assessee u/s 254(2) of the Act, has been allowed.

3.

Learned counsel for appellant strenuously contended that this course amounts to reviewing the earlier order which is not permissible under the law. Reliance has been placed on a judgment of this High Court Dr. Hukumchand Marothi Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, . After having gone through the said judgment, we are of the opinion that it is not applicable to the facts of that instant case. In fact, in the present case a finding in favour the. respondent-assessee was already recorded in the main order passed by the Tribunal on 13-7-2001. The said main order passed by the Tribunal on 13-7-2001 was not challenged by the revenue at any stage. In fact, the Tribunal has already recorded a finding against the revenue but the operative part of the order was not detailed due to bona fide mistake. By the impugned order the operative part of the earlier order has been clarified. Against such an order we find that no appeal would be maintainable as no substantial question of law is involved in the said appeal.

4.

Accordingly, we dismiss this appeal in limine.