High CourtsFull Bench(2002) 08 RAJ CK 0102

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Sangam Cinema

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 21 August 2002 · Citation: (2003) 132 TAXMAN 1

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y.R. Meena, J · Shashi Kant Sharma, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Reference No. 5 of 1997 21 August 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 182 words

On all application filed u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Tribunal has referred the following question for, the opinion of this court :

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the ITAT was right in treating cinema building as Plant and consequently allowing higher depreciation ?"

2.

Heard learned counsel for the revenue. None appeared for the assessee.

3.

Mr. Mathur, learned counsel for the revenue submits that now issue in this case is squarely covered by the decision of the Apex Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Trivandrum Vs. M/s. Anand Theatres, wherein their Lordships have taken the view that any building, specially designed cannot be treated as plant.

4.

Following the view taken by their Lordships in the case of Anand Theatres (supra), we are of the view that the Tribunal has Committed error in treating the cinema building as plant.

5.

In the result, we answer the question proposed in affirmative, i.e., in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.

6.

Reference so made stands disposed of accordingly.