Supreme CourtFull Bench(2001) 10 SC CK 0092

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Ramanathapuram Distt. Co-op. Central Bank Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 30 October 2001 · Citation: (2002) 175 CTR 297 : (2002) 255 ITR 423

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. K. Sabharwal, J · S. P. Bharucha, J · Brijesh Kumar, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No: 4477 of 1998; 4478 of 1998; 4479 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 184 words
1.

The High Court has answered against the Revenue, the following question :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was correct in law in holding that the interest on securities, subsidies received from the Government and dividend business income of the Assessee entitled to deduction u/s 80P(2)(a)(i) of the income tax Act, 1961 ?"

2.

The very question was considered by this court in Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. KARNATAKA STATE CO-OPERATIVE APEX BANK, and the conclusion was reiterated in Mehsana District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. Vs. Income Tax Officer, .

3.

It is now contended on behalf of the Revenue that the decision of this court in United Commercial Bank Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, West Bengal, was not considered.

4.

We do not think that it is open to the Revenue to urge, through different counsel, the same thing again and again. We are satisfied that the answer to the question has been correctly given in the decisions aforementioned and in the order under appeal.

5.

The civil appeals are dismissed with costs.