High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 07 MAD CK 0032

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Premier Instruments (CBE) Ltd.

Madras High Court · Decided on 10 July 2002 · Citation: (2003) 185 CTR 566

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.S. Sirpurkar, J · N.V. Balasubramanian, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case No. 1079 of 1987 & Tax Case No. 1079 of 1987 10 July 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

11 paragraphs · 224 words

V.S. Sirpurkar, J.—The question referred is as under:

On the facts and in the circumstances of the case whether the Tribunal is correct in allowing depreciation on exchange fluctuation relating to the

asst. yr. 1979-80 ?

2.

The question referred is already decided subsequently by the various decisions including that of the Supreme Court. In our opinion, therefore,

the Tribunal was right in giving the benefit of Section 43A in favour of the assessee. It has not been disputed before us that the value of the assets

acquired from outside India with foreign exchange suffered a modification in their value as a result the fluctuations in the foreign exchange as

between the rate determined by the Government and the actual rates. The Tribunal, in our view, has correctly held that the increased liability would

go to increase the cost of the asset. The Tribunal has also correctly held that the difference has arisen due to the refixation of the value of the

foreign currency to Indian rupee by the Government of India and has eventually correctly held that the appellant would be entitled to the

depreciation of Rs. 5,38,192. In that view, we are of the opinion that the Tribunal''s order is correct and needs no interference. Accordingly, the

question referred is answered against the Revenue and in favour of the assessee. No costs.