High CourtsDivision Bench(1996) 02 AHC CK 0105

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Pramod Kumar Jain

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 16 February 1996 · Citation: (1996) 221 ITR 193

HON’BLE JUDGES
Om Prakash, J · M.C. Agarwal, J
RESULT
Partly Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax A. No. 253 of 1995

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 206 words
1.

The Revenue has made this application u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, requiring us to direct the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal to refer the following two questions for an opinion of this court :

" 1. Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in sustaining the order of the first appellate authority that the assessee, a salaried employee of the LIC, was entitled to deduction at 50 per cent. on the incentive bonus received from his employer ?

2.

Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal was justified in law in holding that the assessee, a salaried employee of the LIC of India, was entitled to deduction at 40 per cent. u/s 10(14) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, on the incentive bonus received from his employer ?"

2.

Inasmuch as only question No. 1 arises from the Tribunal''s order which is a question of law, in our opinion, we direct the Tribunal to draw up a statement of the case and refer the abovementioned question No. 1 to this court for its opinion.

3.

The application is, therefore, partly allowed.