High CourtsDivision Bench(1995) 03 MAD CK 0148

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Murugesa Naicker Mansion

Madras High Court · Decided on 8 March 1995

HON’BLE JUDGES
T. Jayarama Chouta, J · K.A. Thanikkachalam, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case Petition No. 458 of 1989

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 342 words

Thanikkachalam, J.—In this tax case petition, the Department requested this court to direct the Tribunal to refer the following question of law said to have arisen out of the order of the Tribunal for our opinion u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in holding that the status of the assessee is that of a co-owner and not an ''association of persons''?"

2.

The assessee claimed that his status is that of a co-owner whereas the Department assessed the assessee in the status of association of persons. The Tribunal held that inasmuch as the assessee was assessed as a co-owner in the previous assessment years, his status should be taken as that of a co-owner and should not be taken as that of an association of persons. While coming to this conclusion the Tribunal followed an earlier decision in the case of COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, MADRAS-II Vs. BLUE MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING CORPORATION., .

3.

Learned standing counsel for the Department submitted that in S.C.P. No. 73 of 1978 leave was granted by the High Court as against the judgment rendered in COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, MADRAS-II Vs. BLUE MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING CORPORATION., . It was also brought to our notice that in Tax Cases No. 338 to 340 of 1984 ( Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. K. Chandrasekaran and Others, ), an order was passed following the decision rendered in COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax, MADRAS-II Vs. BLUE MOUNTAIN ENGINEERING CORPORATION., . As against the order passed in Tax Cases Nos. 338 to 340 of 1984 ( Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. K. Chandrasekaran and Others, ), special leave petitions were filed before the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court dismissed the said special leave petitions (vide CIT v. K. Chandrasekaran [1989] 178 ITR 73.

4.

In view of the foregoing reasons we consider that no referable question of law arises from the order of the Tribunal. Accordingly, this tax case petition is dismissed. No costs.