High CourtsDivision Bench(1986) 08 AHC CK 0066

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Murti Devi Pradeep Kumar

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 4 August 1986 · Citation: (1986) 57 CTR 237 : (1987) 163 ITR 803

HON’BLE JUDGES
R.R. Misra, J · N.D. Ojha, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Application No''s. 132 to 137 of 1984

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 254 words

N.D. Ojha, J.—In these six applications made by the Commissioner of Income Tax u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the assessee is common and the six cases relate to the assessment years 1975-76, 1976-77, 1977-78, 1978-79, 1979-80 and 1980-81. In all these cases, the Income Tax Officer had allowed the relief of partial partition relying on a decision of this court in Daya Shanker Vijay Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, . The Commissioner of Income Tax initiated proceedings for revising the aforesaid order u/s 263 of the Act on the ground that the Department had not accepted the decision of this court in the case of Daya Shanker Vijay Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, and had filed an appeal in the Supreme Court. The order of the Commissioner of Income Tax, however, was reversed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on appeal. These applications have been made by the Commissioner of Income Tax with the prayer that the Tribunal may be required to refer the common question mentioned in these applications to this court for its opinion.

2.

Having heard counsel for the applicant, we are of the opinion that till the decision of this court in the case of Daya Shanker Vijay Kumar Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, was reversed by the Supreme Court, the same is binding on the Department and no statable question of law can be said to arise.

3.

All these applications are, accordingly, dismissed ; but, there shall be no order as to costs.