High CourtsDivision Bench(2000) 06 BOM CK 0043

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Mula Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 6 June 2000 · Citation: (2002) 256 ITR 81 : (2000) 256 ITR 81 : (2003) 126 TAXMAN 247

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, J · R.M.S. Khandeparkar, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Appeal No. 333 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 169 words
1.

Admit.

2.

Respondents waive service.

3.

Since a short point is involved, the matter is disposed of at the stage of admission. Two questions have been raised in this appeal, which are as follows :

"(a) Whether non-refundable deposits collected by the Assessee-society, out of the sugarcane purchase price payable to the cane growers ,are trading receipts of the assessee-society ?

(b) Whether interest on such non-refundable deposits, are trading receipts of the assessee-society ?"

4.

On May 4, 2000, the Division Bench of this court (to which one of us, Kapadia J. is a party) in Income Tax Reference No. 449 of 1995 Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Chhatrapati Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd. and Rahuri Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana Ltd., has taken the view that the non-refundable deposit (NRD) constituted trading receipts of the assessee.

5.

In view of the above judgment, both the above questions are answered in the affirmative and in favour of the Revenue. Accordingly, the appeal is allowed with no order as to costs.