High CourtsDivision Bench(2008) 09 DEL CK 0188

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Mrs. Urmila Lohia

Delhi High Court · Decided on 9 September 2008

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajiv Shakdher, J · Badar Durrez Ahmed, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
IT Appeal No. 1036 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 191 words
1.

This appeal is directed against the order passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal on 30-11-2007 pertaining to the assessment year 1998-1999. The issue raised before the Tribunal was with regard to the validity of the assessment order passed u/s 143(3)/ 147 of the income tax Act, 1961. The Tribunal noted that the notice u/s 148 was issued after a period of four years after the end of the relevant assessment year and, therefore, proviso would be applicable. In such a situation it would have to be returned as a finding of fact that the assessee had failed to make a full and true disclosure of the material facts. The Tribunal, on a consideration of the factual position, has returned a finding that there was no failure on the part of the assessee to make a full and true disclosure of the material facts. The Tribunal also noted that the assessee had disclosed all the material at the time of the original assessment u/s 143(3). We see no reason to interfere with these pure findings of fact. No substantial question of law arises for our consideration. The appeal is dismissed.