High CourtsDivision Bench(2012) 06 GUJ CK 0035

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Madhur Shares and Stocks Pvt Ltd

Gujarat High Court · Decided on 11 June 2012

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.M. Sahai, J · N.V. Anjaria, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
TAX APPEAL No. 2398 of 2010

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 272 words

Honourable Mr. Justice V.M. Sahai

1.

We have heard Mr. M.R. Bhatt, learned Senior Standing Counsel appearing for the income tax Department. This appeal has been filed challenging the order dated 31.5.2010 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by which the Tribunal has dismissed the appeal filed by the revenue by making the following observations :-

"We have considered that rival submissions and perused the material on record. In our considered view, there is no interference is called for in the learned C.I.T. (A). It is because the subject matter of penalty was the addition on account of bad debts which have been totally deleted by the Tribunal in the order of even date. In other words, entire claim of the assessee has been considered as business loss. Once the addition does not survive, no penalty can be levied as held in Additional Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Badri Prasad Kashi Prasad, , (2) ACIT v. VIP Industries (2009) 122 TTJ - 289 (Mum); (3) CIT v. Mohd Bux Sokat Ali 265 ITR - 326 (Raj); (4) COMMISSIONER OF Income Tax Vs. BENGAL JUTE MILLS CO. LTD., and (5) Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Shishpal, as the entire deduction is deleted, there is no case for sustaining any penalty."

2.

Since the additions made against the assessee has been deleted by the Tribunal, therefore, there is no question of levying any penalty from the assessee. For the aforesaid reasons, we do not find any merit in this appeal nor any question of law, much less any substantial question of law arises in this appeal. This tax appeal is accordingly summarily dismissed.