High CourtsDivision Bench(1997) 02 MAD CK 0049

Commissioner of Income Tax vs M. Balasubramanian

Madras High Court · Decided on 26 February 1997 · Citation: (2000) 246 ITR 796

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.V. Balasubramanian, J · Abdul Hadi, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case No. 616 of 1984 (Reference No. 542 of 1984)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

9 paragraphs · 210 words

N.V. Balasubramanian, J.—At the instance of the Revenue, the Appellate Tribunal has stated the case and referred the following question of

law u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, for the opinion of this court :

Whether having regard to Rules 5 and 7 in Part IV of the First Schedule to the Finance Act, 1979, the assessee''s share of loss from a firm should

be taken into account and given set off while computing the net agricultural income of the assessee for the year 1979-80 ?

2.

A similar question came up before this court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M. Manickasundaram, wherein this court has held

that the share of loss of an unregistered firm could not be taken into account and set off against the assessee''s other agricultural income, while

computing his net agricultural income in assessing to tax his non-agricultural income for the purpose of fixing the rate of tax.

3.

We are of the opinion that the decision of this court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. M. Manickasundaram, would govern the

facts of the case as well. Accordingly, we answer the question referred to us in the negative and in favour of the Department. No costs.