Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 12 SC CK 0054

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Laxmi Wine Merchants

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 6 December 2000 · Citation: (2001) 251 ITR 882 : (2002) 9 SCC 621

HON’BLE JUDGES
Y. K. Sabharwal, J · S. P. Bharucha, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal 4158, 4159, 4160, 4161, 4162, 4163 and 4164 of 1994

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 222 words
1.

The High Court declined to call for a reference of the following question :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the income tax Appellate Tribunal is justified in holding that the assessee was entitled to the benefits of registration in spite of contravention of rules 38 and 39 of the A. P. Foreign Liquor and Indian Liquor Rules, 1970 ?"

2.

It did so because of an earlier decision in Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh-IV Vs. Nalli Venkataramana and Others, . The Revenue is, therefore, in appeal by special leave. The decision of the High Court in the case of Commissioner of Income Tax, Andhra Pradesh-IV Vs. Nalli Venkataramana and Others, was considered by this court in Bihari Lal Jaiswal and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others, and was found unacceptable. It is, therefore, clear that a question of law does arise which requires the consideration of the High Court, in the light of the judgment of this court in the case of Bihari Lal Jaiswal and Others Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax and Others, .

3.

The civil appeals are allowed. The order under appeal is set aside. The Tribunal shall refer to the High Court the question aforestated, having drawn up a statement of case.

4.

No order as to costs.