High CourtsDivision Bench(1996) 01 AHC CK 0036

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Lakhpat Rai Nand Lal

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 22 January 1996 · Citation: (1998) 146 CTR 449 : (1996) 220 ITR 318

HON’BLE JUDGES
Om Prakash, J · M. Katju, J
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Reference No. 296 of 1989

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 206 words
1.

In this application made u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal referred the following question for opinion of this court :

" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Rasoi expenses of Rs. 20,122 were in the nature of entertainment expenditure and were disallowable u/s 37(2B) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?"

2.

Learned standing counsel relying on CIT v. Patel Bros. and Co. Ltd. : [1995]215ITR165(SC) urged before us that the aforesaid question is fully covered by the said decision in which it has been held that ordinary hospitality shown by an assessee does not amount to entertainment. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal by an order dated October 28, 1978, relating to the assessment year 1975-76 found that it was a case of ordinary hospitality, extended by the assessee. We, therefore, agree that the aforesaid question is fully covered by the aforementioned decision of the Supreme Court and following the same we answer the above question in the negative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Revenue.

3.

Record of this case be sent down to the Appellate Tribunal to enable it to pass an order conformably to our order.