High CourtsDivision Bench(1978) 09 AHC CK 0054

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Krishi Udyog Evam Saurkusha Pradershini

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 25 September 1978 · Citation: (1979) 9 CTR 176 : (1981) 128 ITR 214

HON’BLE JUDGES
Satish Chandra, C.J · Kamta Nath Seth, J
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Reference No. 32 of 1976

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 200 words

Satish Chandra, C.J.—u/s 10(20) of the I.T. Act, 1961, income of a local authority, from a trade or business carried on by it within its own jurisdictional area is exempt from tax. In the present case, the controversy was whether the District Board was itself running the mela and exhibition in question and so entitled to the exemption. The Tribunal has held that though the District Board has constituted a committee to organize this mela and exhibition, it was in fact being organized by the District Board itself. This finding was reached after a consideration of the rules in question and the resolutions of the District Board as well as of the committee.

2.

We have heard learned counsel and, in our opinion, the finding that the mela and exhibition were in fact being run by the District Board is on a question of fact and does not betray any erroneous approach in law.

3.

''We, therefore, answer the question referred to us whether the assessee was entitled to execution u/s 10(20) of the Act in the affirmative, in favour of the assessee and against the department. The assesses will be entitled to costs which are assessed at Rs. 200.