High CourtsDivision Bench(2003) 09 AHC CK 0249

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Kishore Chand Shivcharan Lal

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 16 September 2003 · Citation: (2004) 266 ITR 37 : (2004) 138 TAXMAN 256

HON’BLE JUDGES
Umeshwar Pandey, J · M. Katju, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Reference No. 62 of 1983

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 229 words
1.

This is an Income Tax reference u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, in which the following question has been referred to us for our opinion :

"Whether the Tribunal was correct in holding that the claims of the assessee for deduction on account of dues demanded by the Electricity Board for earlier years, which have not yet been fully ascertained and also had been all along disputed by the assessee, could be allowed in the assessment year 1976-77 specially when the assessee observed the mercantile system of accounts and had made no provision in the years of demands ?"

2.

We have carefully perused the appellate order of the Tribunal and find no illegality in the same. The claim of deduction of the petitioner was in respect of dues demanded by the U. P. State Electricity Board. The assessee disputed the amount claimed by the Board and the liability was yet to be ascertained in the relevant assessment year, which is 1976-77.

3.

The Tribunal, in our opinion, has rightly held that the assessee-firm is eligible to claim the amount to the extent, these are ascertained against the assessee''s income pertaining to the relevant assessment year.

4.

We find no error of law in the Tribunal''s order. The question referred is, therefore, decided in the affirmative, i.e., in favour of the assessee and against the Department.