High CourtsDivision Bench(1995) 04 P&H CK 0053

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Kishan Chand

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 19 April 1995 · Citation: (1996) 134 CTR 510 : (1996) 217 ITR 534

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.S. Sudhalkar, J · R.P. Sethi, J
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Case No. 101 of 1992

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 201 words
1.

We have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the record including the order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal. In our opinion, questions Nos. 1 and 3 as detailed in paragraph 2 of the application are not such questions which require to be referred to this court for adjudication in terms of Sub-section (2) of Section 256 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, However, we find that question No. 2 regarding the service of notice by affixture is a question of law requiring adjudication, by this court.

2.

The petition is disposed of with a direction to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Amritsar, to refer the following question of law to this court for its opinion in terms of the provisions of Section 256 of the Income Tax Act :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal is right in law in upholding the findings of the Appellate Assistant Commissioner of Income tax, Jalandhar Range, Jalandhar, to the effect that the service of notice by affixture cannot be said to be proper service especially when the assessee had refused to accept the service of the said notice ? "