High CourtsFull Bench(2002) 12 AHC CK 0169

Commissioner of Income Tax vs K. Wadhumal and Sons

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 5 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 130 TAXMAN 611

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yatindra Singh, J · M. Katju, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Ref. No. 301 of 1983 5 December 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 215 words

This is an Income Tax reference u/s 256(1) of the Income Tax Act in which the following question has been referred to us for our opinion :

"Whether the Tribunal was justified in holding that there should be two separate assessments for the two periods in the case ?"

2.

The relevant assessment year is 1980-81. During this assessment year one of the partners Kewal Bai died and thereafter a new partnership deed was entered into by which a new partner was indicated. The question is whether it was a case of dissolution or reconstitution of the firm.

3.

it is settled law that ordinarily on the death of a partner, the partnership firm is automatically dissolved vide section 42 of the Indian Partnership Act. The only exception is where in the partnership deed it is mentioned that on death of a partner the firm will not dissolve. In this case there is nothing to show that there is any mention in the partnership deed that the firm shall not automatically dissolve on the death of a partner.

4.

Hence, in view of the decision of the Supreme Court in COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX Vs. EMPIRE ESTATE., this reference is decided in the affirmative, that is, in favour of the assessee and against the department.