High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 08 DEL CK 0241

Commissioner of Income Tax vs J.K. Synthetics Ltd.

Delhi High Court · Decided on 16 August 2010 · Citation: (2010) 328 ITR 6

HON’BLE JUDGES
Reva Khetrapal, J · A.K. Sikri, J
CASE NUMBER
ITR 21 of 1992

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 197 words

A.K. Sikri, J.—The question is as to whether the assessee should have been allowed depreciation @ 15% on plants used in manufacturing of cement and packaging of cement etc. or @ 10% as done by the Assessing Officer. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed the depreciation @ 15% as was done in the previous years as well. This is clear from the following:

Here we find that this issue was considered by the Tribunal in the assessee''s own case in earlier year. The CIT (Appeals) has allowed depreciation at the rate of 15% on the plant and machinery of the assessee on the basis of the decision of the Tribunal for the assessment years 1975-76 to 1983-84, in I.T.A. Nos. 715 (del) of 85 and 795 (Del) of 87. Respectfully following the decision of the Tribunal, we are of the opinion that no interference is called for.

2.

Mr. Monga informs that in respect of assessment year 1975-76 the reference was returned unanswered in ITR 286/1987 because of insubstantial tax effect. This case relates to the assessment year 1977-78 and, therefore, same reasons apply for this assessment year as well.

3.

Accordingly, we return this reference answered.