High CourtsFull Bench(2002) 04 RAJ CK 0031

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Hotel Hiltop

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 11 April 2002 · Citation: (2002) 175 CTR 600

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.N. Mathur, J · D.N. Joshi, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Ref. No. 39 of 1997 11 April 2002

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 203 words

By the Court

The Appellate Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur has made the following reference to this court seeking opinion on the following substantial question of law :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was legally justified in allowing the claim of the assessee for investment allowance u/s 32A, treating the hotel as an industrial undertaking ?"

2.

The respondent-assessee is engaged in the business of running hotel in the name of M/s Hotel Hiltop, Udaipur. The assessee claimed investment allowance on certain equipments classified as plant and machine. The Commissioner confirmed the assessment made by the assessing officer. However, the Tribunal held that hotel is a industrial undertaking and hence was entitled to the investment allowance. The Hon''ble Apex Court in Commissioner of Income Tax, Trivandrum Vs. M/s. Anand Theatres, has held that the theatre building and hotel building specially equipped for the purposes of business are still building and as such not entitled to depreciation at rate applicable to plant. Thus, the question referred has been answered by the decision of the Hon''ble Apex Court in Anand Theatres case (supra).

Accordingly, this reference is answered in favour of the revenue and against the assessee.

OPEN