High CourtsDivision Bench(1982) 07 MP CK 0008

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Govindram Saksariya Charity Trust

Madhya Pradesh High Court · Decided on 22 July 1982 · Citation: (1984) 145 ITR 253 : (1985) 22 TAXMAN 417

HON’BLE JUDGES
K.N. Shukla, J · G.G.Sohani, J
CASE NUMBER
Miscellaneous Civil Case No''s. 209, 210 and 211 of 1981

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 344 words

Shukla, J.—This is an application u/s 256(2) of the I.T. Act seeking a direction to the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, Indore, to state the case and refer it for decision of certain questions stated in the application.

2.

The assessee is a public charitable trust whose income has been treated as exempt u/s 11 of the I.T Act, 1961. For the assessment year 1973-74, the ITO granted exemption to the assessee u/s 11 of the I.T. Act. The Commissioner acting u/s 263 of the Act sent for the record and after perusal noted that the ITO did not examine certain facts, which according to him disqualified the assessee, u/s 13(1)(c) of the Act, from earning exemption u/s 11 of the Act. According to the Commissioner certain loans were advanced to persons who fell within the category referred to under Sub-section (3) of 13 of the Act. He accordingly set aside the assessment and directed the ITO to examine the points mentioned in his order regarding the grant of exemption of income claimed by the assessee u/s 11 of the Act.

3.

The assessee went in appeal before the Appellate Tribunal challenging the order passed by the Commissioner. The Appellate Tribunal observed that the ITO had examined the entire record and had granted exemption after considering all the relevant facts. The Revenue sought a reference u/s 256(1) of the Act but the Appellate Tribunal declined to make any reference.

4.

We have examined the orders of the ITO and the Appellate Tribunal. We are satisfied that the following question of law arises out of the Tribunal''s order and we, therefore, direct that the Tribunal shall state the case and refer it to us for determination of the said question:

" Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, and on the basis of the material available on record, the Tribunal was right in holding that the ITO had granted exemption u/s 11 to the assessee-trust after making thorough enquiries about the applicability of Section 13(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 ?"