Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2012) 09 SC CK 0026

Commissioner of Income Tax vs General Contracts Company

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 11 September 2012 · Citation: (2012) 254 CTR 223 : (2012) 210 TAXMAN 277

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, C.J. · Madan B. Lokur, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 3207 of 2007

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 176 words
1.

None appears for the Respondent, though served. This civil appeal filed by the Department concerns asst. yr. 1987-88.

2.

A short question which arises for determination in this civil appeal is, whether the Assessee was entitled to investment allowance u/s 32A(2)(b) of the Income Tax Act, 1961?

3.

Section 32A(2)(b) of Income Tax Act, 1961, as it stood at the relevant time, has been extensively quoted in the order of the AO (see p. 37 of the paper book).

4.

The AO came to the conclusion that the Assessee claimed to be in the business of mining; the only activity undertaken by it was removal of overburden/earth excavation work carried out for facilitating mining at lignite project site at Rajpardi and Pandhro; and that the Assessee was merely a labour contractor. These findings of fact have been upheld by the Tribunal and they have not even been discussed in the impugned judgment of the High Court. For the aforestated reasons, the civil appeal filed by the Department is allowed with no order as to costs.