High CourtsDivision Bench(2000) 11 CAL CK 0051

Commissioner of Income Tax vs E.L. Properties (P.) Ltd.

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 13 November 2000 · Citation: (2001) 166 CTR 485 : (2001) 248 ITR 14

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ranjan Kumar Mazumdar, J · Ajoy Nath Ray, J
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax P. No. 175 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 223 words
1.

This is an application for confirmation of rule. The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal allowed in this case a deduction of Rs. 65,653, which was interest payable by the assesses in respect of unpaid municipal rates due to the Calcutta Municipal Corporation.

2.

The Income Tax Appellate Tribunal reversed the decision of the Assessing Officer and the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals).

3.

It is settled beyond dispute that interest on late payment of municipal rates is not in the nature of a payment of penalty, and is thus clearly deductible as general business expenses u/s 37.

4.

The requirement of section 43B that even for assessees following the mercantile system, payments by way of tax, duty, cess, etc., cannot be claimed as deductions unless actual payment has been made in the previous year, is also not applicable in this case, because the words of the section encompass the municipal rates, but not interest thereon.

5.

There are binding authorities for this proposition, so far as we are concerned (see Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Padmavati Raje Cotton Mills Ltd., and Hindustan Motors Limited Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, .

6.

Confirmation of rule would thus be an empty exercise. Rule is thus discharged.

7.

Parties and all others concerned to act on a signed copy of this order on the usual undertakings.