High CourtsDivision Bench(2010) 04 BOM CK 0114

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Dresser Rand India P. Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 8 April 2010 · Citation: (2011) 330 ITR 453 : (2011) 200 TAXMAN 84

HON’BLE JUDGES
J.P. Devadhar, J · D.Y. Chandrachud, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Income Tax A. No. 4168 of 2009

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 465 words
1.

The appeal by the Revenue u/s 260A of the income tax Act, 1961 arises out of an order of the income tax Appellate Tribunal dated April 23, 2009 in relation to the assessment year 2003-04. The appeal is admitted on the following two questions:

(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the hon''ble income tax Appellate Tribunal is correct in holding that receipts from ''interest on deposits'' and ''miscellaneous income (reversal of LD charges)'' are derived from the business of industrial undertaking and therefore are eligible for claim of deduction u/s 80IB, despite there being no direct nexus between source of these receipts and business of industrial undertaking ?

(ii) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the hon''ble income tax Appellate Tribunal is right in holding that 90 per cent. of receipts from freight and insurance, packing charges, sales tax set off and gross service income are not to be excluded from the profits of the business in terms of Explanation (baa) to section 80HHC of the Act, despite there being no direct nexus between the source of these receipts and the export business of the assessee ?

Counsel appearing on behalf of the Revenue and counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee are agreed in stating before the court that question (ii) as formulated shall stand covered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in terms of the decision of the court rendered today in The Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Dresser Rand India Pvt. Ltd., . Since both the appeals relate to the same issue and involve similar questions, they have been heard together. In view of the statement made before the court, question (ii) shall stand answered in favour of the Revenue and against the assessee. In so far as question (i) is concerned, the learned counsel state that the issue as to whether interest on deposits would be allowable towards the deduction u/s 80IB is covered by the decision of the Supreme Court in Liberty India Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, . In the circumstances, the question of law as regards interest on deposits is answered against the assessee and in favour of the Revenue in terms of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, . As regards the question of miscellaneous income (reversal of LD charges), counsel appearing on behalf of the assessee and the Revenue are agreed that the issue may be remanded back to the Tribunal for fresh consideration, in the light of the judgment of the Supreme Court in Liberty India Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, . Ordered accordingly. The appeal is accordingly allowed in the aforesaid terms.

2.

There shall be no order as to costs.