High CourtsFull Bench(2000) 02 RAJ CK 0004

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX vs DHANRAJ MUNDRA

Rajasthan High Court · Decided on 23 February 2000 · Citation: (2001) 116 TAXMAN 132

HON’BLE JUDGES
Rajesh Balia, J · Mohd. Yamin, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Ref. No. 63 of 1999 23 February 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 342 words

This is an application u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) whereby the Commissioner, Udaipur, has sought for a direction to the Tribunal to refer the following question of law to this court for determination :

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no interest can be charged u/s 217(1) or section 217(1A) as the assessee has filed the estimates and has paid tax accordingly, by ignoring the fact that the assessee had filed the estimate u/s 209A(1) whereas the assessing officer charged interest u/s 217(1A) for non-filing of estimates u/s 209A(4) of the Income Tax Act ?"

The Commissioner moved an application u/s 256(1) before the Tribunal for referring the above question of law to this court. The Tribunal rejected the above application vide its order dated 4-5-1998 holding that answer to the question is self-evident and, therefore, it need not be referred.

2.

Having heard the learned counsel for the revenue, we are of the opinion that the question raised is a question of law and as it involves interpretation of statutory provision and effect of omission of section 209A with effect from 1-4-1988 on the obligation of the assessee to furnish estimate of his income u/s 209A during the financial year relevant to the assessment year 1988-89, which requires consideration.

3.

The Tribunal has erred in rejecting the application u/s 256(1) on the ground that answer is self-evident.

4.

In this view of the matter, we allow this reference application and direct the Tribunal, Jaipur Bench, Jaipur, to refer the following question for determination to this court:

"Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in holding that no interest can be charged u/s 217(1) or section 217(1A) when the assessee has filed the estimate of his income u/s 209A(1) and paid tax accordingly, and that he was not required to file estimate of his income u/s 209A(4) of the Income Tax Act, thereafter?"