High CourtsDivision Bench(1995) 04 MAD CK 0065

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Chennai Properties and Investments Ltd.

Madras High Court · Decided on 24 April 1995 · Citation: (1996) 217 ITR 640

HON’BLE JUDGES
T. Jayarama Chouta, J · K.A. Thanikkachalam, J
CASE NUMBER
Tax Case Petition No. 13 of 1994

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 256 words
1.

In this tax case petition, the Department requests this court to direct the Tribunal to refer the following questions of law, said to arise out of the

order of the Tribunal, for the opinion of this court, u/s 256(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961:

(1) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in law in holding that the rent receipts derived by

the assessee-company from letting out of properties should be assessed under the head ''Business'' thereby allowing the expenses incurred for

letting out the properties, as business expenditure?

(2) Whether, on the facts and in the circumstance of the case, the Appellate Tribunal was right in not considering the applicability of the provisions

of section 43B for disallowing the disputed urban land tax if the income is to be assessed under ''business'' and the non-deductibility of the cost of

supplying drinking water from the income from property''?

2.

In so far as question No. 1 is concerned, a similar question was directed to be referred by this court in Tax Case Petition No. 33 of 1990 by

order dated April 23, 1990. So far as the second question is concerned, the answer to be given on the first question will have a bearing in deciding

the second question. Accordingly, we direct the Tribunal to refer the aforesaid two questions of law for the opinion of the this court along with the

statement of facts of the case. Accordingly, this tax case petition is ordered.