High CourtsFull Bench(2000) 07 BOM CK 0018

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Brihan Maharashtra Steel Industries (P) Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 24 July 2000 · Citation: (2001) 118 TAXMAN 508

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.H. Kapadia, J · J.N. Patel, J
CASE NUMBER
IT Appeal No. 4 of 2000 24 July 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 185 words

Kapadia, J.

The short point which arises for consideration in this appeal is : Whether the assessing officer was justified in making adjustment u/s 143(1)(a) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (hereinafter referred to as the Act) by computing deduction u/s 80HHC by reducing the profits on account of deduction admissible u/s 32A of the Act ? Section 80HHC of the Act has undergone several changes. This section has been debated in various decisions of the Tribunal. In fact, a Special Bench of the Tribunal was required to be constituted to interpret the changes in the said section. Under the above circumstances, the assessing officer was not justified in making an adjustment u/s 143(1)(a) by computing the deduction u/s 80HHC after reducing the profits on account of the deduction admissible u/s 32A. In the circumstances, the Tribunal was right in coming to the conclusion that section 143(1)(a) cannot be invoked by the assessing officer. The assessing officer was free to invoke the provisions of section 143(2)/(3) and proceed by way of regular assessment.

2.

Hence, the appeal is dismissed with no order as to costs.