Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2000) 01 SC CK 0012

Commissioner of Income Tax vs Abhijit Iron Processors (P.) Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 3 January 2000 · Citation: (2000) 2 LW(Cri) 747

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. S. M. Quadri, J · S. P. Bharucha, J
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
C.A. No''s. 33, 34, 35 and 36 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

12 paragraphs · 268 words
1.

Leave granted.

2.

The civil appeals must be allowed, being covered in favour of the appellant by the order of this Court dated 1-10-1999 in CIT v. Jaiswal Chemicals (P) Ltd., (2001) 10 SCC 570.

3.

The appeals are, therefore, allowed and the Tribunal is directed to refer to the High Court for its consideration the following question:

"Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of CIT (A) in directing the Assessing Officer to include interest income in the gross total income while computing deduction under Section 80-I of the Act?"

4.

No order as to costs.

Civil Appeal No. 36 of 2000 [arising out of SLP (C) No. 9192 of 1999]

5.

Leave granted.

6.

The civil appeal must be allowed, being covered in favour of the appellant by the order of this Court dated 1-10-1999 in CIT v. Jaiswal Chemicals (P) Ltd., (2001) 10 SCC 570The Tribunal is directed to refer to the High Court for its consideration the following question:

"(i) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was justified in law in upholding the order of CIT, (2001) 10 SCC 570 in directing the Assessing Officer to include interest income in the gross total income while computing the deduction under Section 80-I of the Act?"

7.

No order requiring a reference is made in regard to the second question as it was not raised before the Tribunal.

8.

The civil appeal is allowed to the aforestated extent.

9.

No order as to costs.