High CourtsDivision Bench(2002) 12 AHC CK 0120

Commissioner of Income Tax and Another vs Sardar Industries

Allahabad High Court · Decided on 17 December 2002 · Citation: (2003) 260 ITR 384 : (2003) 130 TAXMAN 589

HON’BLE JUDGES
Yatindra Singh, J · M. Katju, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Income-tax Appeal No. 39 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 206 words
1.

This is an appeal u/s 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961, against the impugned order of the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal for the assessment year 1986-87 passed on August 4, 1999.

2.

The assessee is a registered firm and in the relevant assessment year it was required to obtain a copy of the audit report as per the requirement of Section 44AB of the Income Tax Act. The specified date for obtaining the audit report was October 31, 1986, which was the extended date fixed by the Central Board of Direct Taxes. Admittedly, the petitioner submitted the audit report on September 9, 1986, which was within the extended time. Hence, the Tribunal rightly held that the provision for penalty was not attracted. Moreover, the words "without reasonable cause" have been deleted from Section 271B by the Taxation Laws (Amendment and Miscellaneous Provisions) Act, 1986, with effect from September 10, 1986. In the relevant assessment year the aforesaid words were there and the assessee had given adequate explanation for the delay in submitting its audit report. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) has accepted the explanation of the assessee about reasonable cause for the delay. There is no force in this appeal. It is dismissed.