Tribunals and CommissionsDivision Bench(2026) 01 NCLAT CK 3214

Commissioner Of Customs (Preventive) vs Thiru Arooran Sugars Ltd & Ors.

National Company Law Appellate Tribunal, CHENNAI Bench · Decided on 30 January 2026

HON’BLE JUDGES
Justice Sharad Kumar Sharma, Member (Judicial) · Jatindranath Swain, Member (Technical)
CASE NUMBER
Company Appeal (AT) (CH) (Ins) No. 57/2026 (IA Nos. 144, 145, 146 & 147/2026)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 238 words

ORDER

This Company Appeal challenges the order of 02.05.2022, that was passed in CP(CAA)/30/CHE/2022 in CA(CAA)/113/CHE/2021 in IBA/243/2019. The impugned order under challenge was rendered in the proceedings under Section 230 (1) of the Companies Act, and Section 66 of the Companies Act, 2013, to be read along with the applicable provisions contained under the I&B Code.

Be that as it may. After the dismissal of the proceedings of the Company Petition on 02.05.2022, the Appellant has approached this Tribunal by filing a Company Appeal No. 58/2023 invoking the provisions contained under Section 421 of the Companies Act. That was decided against the Appellant, holding that, the Company Appeal under Section 421 of the Companies Act, would not be maintainable as decided by the judgment rendered by us on 30.08.2025. It was thereafter that the instant Company Appeal has been preferred, which is accompanied with a Condone Delay Application praying for condonation of 1297 days of delay. Since, the Appeal has been preferred under Section 61 of I&B Code and the number of days of delay that has been sought to be condoned is much beyond the prescribed statutory period, as contemplated under the proviso to sub-section 2 of Section 61 and even much beyond the condonable period as given therein, the Condone Delay application IA No. 145/2026 would stand rejected. As a consequence thereto, the Company Appeal too would stand rejected. All Interlocutory Applications would stand closed.