Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2015) 05 SC CK 0043

Commissioner of Customs, Delhi - Appellant @HASH Baxter (I) Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 8 May 2015 · Citation: (2015) 320 ELT 36 : (2015) 14 SCC 766

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal Nos. 2837-2839 of 2005.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

26 paragraphs · 253 words
1.

The question involved in the present appeal is as to whether Continuous Ambulatory Peritoneal Dialysis Fluid (CAPD fluid) is medical equipment which attracts nil rate of Customs duty. Not only this position was conceded to by Departmental representative before the Tribunal, even otherwise we find that the aforesaid item is specifically included as medical equipment. Chapter Heading 90 is as follows :

S. No.

Chapter or Heading No. or Sub-Heading No.

Description of goods

Standard rate

Addl. Duty Rate

Condition No.

348

90 or any other

The following goods namely (A) Medical Equipment (excluding) Foley Baloon Catheters) and other Goods specified in List 29

Nil

(B) Accessories of the Medical Equipment at (A) above.

Nil

Nil

(C) Parts required for the maintenance and spare parts required for the maintenance of the medical equipment at (A) above

Nil

Nil

53

2.

On going through the list 29 we find that in the said list at Serial No. 46 CAPD fluid is specifically mentioned. It would, thus, clearly fall within the aforesaid nomenclature, namely, medical equipment and that is no duty was to be paid on the import of this equipment.

3.

The appeals are accordingly dismissed as devoid of any merits.

4.

[The amount which was deposited by the respondent, shall be refunded to the respondent within three months, in accordance with law.]

Text corrected as per Corrigenda, dated 15-5-2015

issued by Supreme Court

and

As per Corrigenda Published in

2016 (331) E.L.T. 320 (11th January, 2016 - Vol. 331 : Part 2)]