Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2015) 09 SC CK 0037

Commissioner of Central Excise, Mumbai - Appellant @HASH Gurera Synthtics Pvt. Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 9 September 2015 · Citation: (2015) 324 ELT 13 : (2016) 12 SCC 297

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 287 of 2007.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 184 words
1.

For the period June, 1994 to April, 1998, show cause notice was issued to the respondent-assessee herein on 2-7-1999, invoking extended period of limitation and demanding differential duty of Rs. 11,53,136/-.

2.

It was alleged therein that for the Grey fabric used by the assessee for the manufacture of its products, less value of the said fabric was quoted. The defence of the assessee was that the aforesaid Grey fabric is supplied by different merchant manufacturers to the assessee and the price shown in the invoice was taken into consideration while disclosing the value of the product.

3.

It has come on record that the aforesaid merchant manufacturers were disclosing lesser value. It has also come on record that this fact was not known to the assessee. Therefore, the assessee could not be made responsible for the aforesaid.

4.

The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal has, therefore, rightly absolved the assessee of any liability.

5.

Even otherwise, the amount involved is only Rs. 11.53 lakhs.

6.

On these facts, no question of law arises for consideration. The appeal is, accordingly, dismissed.