Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2015) 08 SC CK 0028

Commissioner of Central Excise, Jaipur-I - Appellant @HASH J.K. Synthetics Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 26 August 2015 · Citation: (2015) 323 ELT 446

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
RESULT
Allowed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 2850 of 2006 with C.A. No. 2851 of 2006.

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 227 words
1.

These appeals are filed by the Revenue with regard to the demand of duty on base yard which is captively used for texturising purpose. It was alleged in the show cause notice that substantial quantity of Nylon yard was being used for the manufacture of textured yarn. However, duty was not paid to the extent of base yarn rendered waste due to conversion of base yard and in the show cause notice duty was demanded. Show cause notice was amended after one year by substituting the word �loss� in place of the word �waste�.

2.

It is not in dispute that on waste no duty is payable and this aspect has been dealt with by the Tribunal in Modipon Ltd. v. C.C.K. Meerut [1999 (114) E.L.T. 359]. Insofar as the present case is concerned, the Tribunal has observed in the impugned order that the authorities are treating �loss� and �waste� as the same i.e. there was �waste� of 6.5% of the base yarn during texturizing. In view thereof, we are of the opinion that the case of the respondent-assessee was squarely covered by the decision in the case of Modipon Ltd. (supra) as mentioned above and the Tribunal rightly allowed the appeal of the respondent-assessee setting aside the order passed by the authorities below.

3.

We find no merit in these appeals which are, accordingly, dismissed.