High CourtsDivision Bench(2016) 06 BOM CK 0144

Commissioner of Central Excise vs Crompton Greaves Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 6 June 2016 · Citation: (2016) 338 ELT 29

HON’BLE JUDGES
S.C. Dharmadhikari and Dr. Shalini Phansalkar Joshi, JJ.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Central Excise Appeal No. 40 of 2015 with C.E.A. Nos. 51, 113 & 120 of 2015

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

4 paragraphs · 202 words
1.

We have heard Mr. Mishra appearing on behalf of the Revenue in support of this appeal. It challenges an order passed on 11th February, 2014, by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

2.

The only point is whether the Tribunal has power to extend an interim stay after expiry of a period of 365 days from the date of its grant in view of the newly added proviso to sub-section (2A) of Section 35C of the Central Excise Act, 1944. This proviso has been added with effect from 10th May, 2013.

3.

After the matter was argued for some time, it is conceded by the parties that this issue is squarely covered by a short order dated 8th February, 2016 in several Central Excise Appeals. There are earlier orders and judgments in the field which take a view that the Tribunal''s power is not taken away by such a statutory prescription. The Tribunal is not denuded of its power to extend the stay and in the larger interest of justice. Eventually such orders are passed to do justice and to preserve the subject matter of the litigation.

4.

In such circumstances, following this order, we dismiss the Revenue''s appeals.