Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2016) 04 SC CK 0133

Commissioner of C. Ex., Bhopal vs G.R. Engineering Works Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 1 April 2016 · Citation: (2016) 334 ELT 583

HON’BLE JUDGES
A.K. Sikri and Rohinton Fali Nariman, JJ.
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal Nos. 3360-3361 of 2008

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 197 words
1.

It is not in dispute that the respondent herein has supplied Horton Spheres, four in number, to Indian Oil Corporation. This item does not attract any Excise duty. However, on the ground that even no Excise duty was payable but same was collected by the respondent from the Indian Oil Corporation, a show cause notice was issued raising a demand of Rs. 68,23,400/-. The respondent/assessee denied the same and stated that no such Excise duty on the product Horton Spheres was collected from Indian Oil Corporation. It appears that the cost of the Horton Spheres was worked out as per the details agreed upon between the assessee and the Indian Oil Corporation. The respondent herein has taken a specific stand, which is not disputed, that when the raw material was sent to the manufacturing unit, the aforesaid Excise duty of Rs. 17,06,600/- per Sphere was in fact deposited with the Excise Department. It further becomes clear that as far as final product i.e. Horton Spheres which is supplied to the Indian Oil Corporation no Excise duty had been collected.

2.

We, thus, do not find any infirmity in the impugned order. The appeals are, accordingly, dismissed.