High CourtsDivision Bench(2006) 07 BOM CK 0027

Commissioner of C. Ex. vs Bombay Dyeing and Mfg. Co. Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 13 July 2006 · Citation: (2008) 10 STR 501

HON’BLE JUDGES
V.C. Daga, J · J.P. Devadhar, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Central Excise Appeal No''s. 64 and 100 of 2006 & Central Excise Appeal No. 64 of 2006 and C.E.A. No. 100 of 2006

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 199 words
1.

Heard learned Counsel for the rival parties. Perused record.

2.

The order to the Tribunal revolves around the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal, which are reproduced herein below for immediate reference:

...There is no dispute that the deemed credit taken by the appellant is less than the actual duty paid on the yarn contained is the grey fabrics. The actual quantity of duty of yarn contained is reflected in the Central excise invoices issued by the spinning units to textile mills. Therefore the plea of the appellants that they are entitled to actual credit is required to be accepted.

3.

It is needless to mention that an alternate plea can always be taken before the Tribunal in view of the judgment of the Apex Court in the case of National Thermal Power Co. Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax, .

4.

Having said so, turning to the alternate plea entertained by the Tribunal, which as stated above, revolves around the findings of fact recorded by the Tribunal. We, therefore, do not see any substantial question of law involved in this appeal.

5.

In the result, appeal is dismissed in limine with no order as to costs.