Supreme CourtFull Bench(2000) 07 SC CK 0090

Commercial Tax Officer and Another vs Canara Bank

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 26 July 2000 · Citation: AIR 2000 SC 3602(1) : (2000) 10 JT 187 : (2000) 10 SCC 638

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. P. Bharucha, J · R. C. Lahoti, J · N. Santosh Hedge, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No''s. 2562 and 7763 of 1997 and 3608 and 3550-3553 of 1998

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

6 paragraphs · 176 words

S.P. Bharucha, J.—Learned Counsel for the respondents make the following statement:

In view of the fact that for a proper appreciation of the legal issues arising for consideration, the particulars of the nature of transactions is necessary, leave is sought for withdrawing the writ petitions with liberty to raise all the issues factual and legal, before the concerned authority.

2.

The statement is made after we have heard learned Counsel for the appellants and, partly, learned Counsel for the respondents and have expressed our strong, prima facie, reservations about the correctness of the judgments under appeal.

3.

On the application of learned Counsel for the respondents aforestated, the writ petitions filed before the High Courts of Karnataka and Kerala (Writ Petition Nos. 18751/88,13591/89,1339/93-H, 9508/94-F, 962-63/93-M and 15547/92-A) are allowed to be withdrawn. Consequently, the judgments and orders delivered therein and in appeals therefrom, i.e. , the judgments and orders under appeal stand set aside.

4.

All arguments shall be open to either side in proceedings before the Sales Tax authorities.

5.

No order as to costs.