Supreme CourtDivision Bench(2003) 03 SC CK 0043

Collector of Central Excise, Hyderabad vs Divya Enterprises Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 5 March 2003 · Citation: (2003) 87 ECC 705 : (2003) 108 ECR 641 : (2003) 153 ELT 497 : (2003) 10 SCALE 488 : (2003) 9 SCC 222

HON’BLE JUDGES
S. N. Variava, J · B. N. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 5470 of 2000

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 193 words
1.

Heard the learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

We have seen Notification No. 65 of 1987 dated 1st March, 1987. In our view the interpretation given by the Tribunal cannot be sustained. The impugned order must be and is, therefore, set aside.

3.

Under this Notification Terry towelling was exempted. However the terry-towelling fabric was not exempted. Respondents have paid duty on the exempted item i.e. on towels but duty has not been paid on the fabric. As the notification does not exempt fabrics, duty has to be paid on the fabric under the Heading "5802.12". We, however, direct that the respondent will be given adjustment for the duty paid on the towels. If on calculation of duty, it is found that a higher amount has been paid than what is due on the fabric, then the claim for refund will be allowed. If on the other hand it is found that some duty has still to be paid then the respondent shall pay the duty.

4.

We clarify that this order is applicable only for the period of the notification and not for any other period.

5.

Appeal stands disposed of.