Supreme CourtFull Bench(2011) 09 SC CK 0136

CIT vs Reliance Industries Ltd.

Supreme Court Of India · Decided on 9 September 2011

HON’BLE JUDGES
Swatanter Kumar, J · S.H. Kapadia, J · K.S. Panicker Radhakrishnan, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Civil Appeal No. 7769 of 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 9860 of 2010) , Civil Appeal. No. 7770 of 2011 and S.L.P. (C) No. 10431 of 2010 and Civil Appeal No. 7771 of 2011 (Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No. 23433 of 2011)

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

14 paragraphs · 382 words

Civil Appeal. No. 7769/2011 @ SLP (C) No. 9860/2010 and Appeal No. 7771/2011 @ SLP (C) No. 23433/2011

1.

Leave granted.

2.

Having heard learned Counsel on both sides, we are of the view that the High Court ought not to have dismissed the appeals without considering the following questions, which, according to us, did arise for consideration. They are formulated as under:

(A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in holding that expenditure for earning dividend income cannot be estimated and therefore, cannot be allowed while computing book profits and also under the normal provisions of the Income tax Act?

(B) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in disallowing u/s 43B of the Income tax Act the unpaid custom duty and excise duty included in closing stock?

(C) Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in holding that sales tax incentive is a Capital Receipt?

3.

Accordingly, the civil appeals are allowed, impugned orders are set aside and the cases are remitted to the High Court to decide the questions, formulated above, in accordance with law.

4.

No order as to costs.

Civil Appeal No. 7770/2011 @ SL.P. (C) No. 10431/2010:

5.

Leave granted.

6.

Having heard learned Counsel on both sides, we are of the view that the High Court ought not to have dismissed the appeal without considering the following questions, which, according to us, did arise for consideration. They are formulated as under:

(A) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in holding that estimated expenditure for earning dividend income cannot be subject to disallowance while computing book profits as well as under the normal provisions of the Income tax Act?

(B) Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of the case and in law the Hon'ble Tribunal was right in holding that sales tax incentive is a Capital Receipt?

7.

Accordingly, the civil appeal is allowed, impugned order is set aside and the matter is remitted to the High Court to decide the questions, formulated above, in accordance with law.