High CourtsDivision Bench(1912) 03 BOM CK 0026

Chunilal Sankalchand vs Jaffir Alli Spinning and Weaving Co., Ltd.

Bombay High Court · Decided on 8 March 1912 · Citation: (1912) 14 BOMLR 581

HON’BLE JUDGES
N.G. Chandarvarkar, J · Batchelor, J
CASE NUMBER
First Appeal No. 113 of 1911

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

2 paragraphs · 183 words

N.G. Chandavarkar, J.—The word "Asmani Sultani" has been construed by the learned District Judge as covering all acts of authority speaking in the name of the King and compelling a person to adopt a certain line of conduct independently of the will of that person. We cannot take that view. The phrase means, in our opinion, sortie act such as that of God or of the King''s enemies which is in the nature of a calamity over I which no person can exercise any control. In the case of a litigation like this, it cannot be said that the litigants are subjected to anything like a calamity, because although these are liquidation proceedings, yet they can appear by counsel or pleaders, and satisfy the Court what proper decree the Court should pass having regard to the law. We find in the negative on the first issue and set aside the order rind direct that the proceedings be sent back to the District Judge to be disposed of according to law.

2.

The appellant must have his costs of this appeal from the respondent.