High CourtsSingle Bench(2020) 08 CHH CK 0009

Chudamani Sahu vs State Of Chhattisgarh

Chhattisgarh High Court · Decided on 10 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Sanjay K. Agrawal, J
RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
MCRC No. 1641 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

21 paragraphs · 366 words

@JUDGMENT-JUDGMENT

1.

Proceedings of this matter have been taken up for hearing through video conferencing.

2.

This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has

been arrested in connection with Crime No. 29/2020, registered at Police Station Baradwar, District Janjgir¬Champa (CG) for the offence

punishable under Section 20(B) of Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985.

3.

Case of the prosecution, in brief, is that 20.5 kgs of cannabis was seized from the possession of the present applicant and he thereby, committed the

aforesaid offence.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that the applicant has not committed any offence and he has falsely been implicated in the crime in

question. He would further submit that the applicant is in jail since 24/01/2020 and deserves to be released on bail in light of the decision rendered by

the Supreme Court in Mohan Lal v. State of Punjab (3) CCSC 1568 (SC )wherein it has been held that a person lodging FIR cannot be an

investigating officer.

5.

On the other hand, learned counsel for the State would oppose the bail application.

6.

I have heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and perused the case diary.

7.

Admittedly, 20.5 kgs of cannabis was recovered from the possession of the present applicant which is more than commercial quantity and

therefore, the provisions contained in Section 37(b)(ii) of the NDPS Act is attracted in the present case and considering the material available on

record and considering the recovery made, it cannot be held 1 2018 (3) CCSC 1568 (SC) that the accused/applicant has not committed any offence

and he is not likely to commit any offence further if he is released on bail. So far as the decision of the Supreme Court in Mohan Lal (supra) is

concerned, it has already been referred to the Constitution Bench and it has been reserved for judgment. I do not consider it a fit case to release the

present applicant on bail.

8.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is rejected.

9.

Certified copy, as per rules.