High CourtsSingle Bench(2024) 11 DEL CK 1744

Cholamandalam MS General Insurance Co Ltd vs Rohtash Kumar Gupta & Ors

Delhi High Court · Decided on 14 November 2024

HON’BLE JUDGES
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
MAC.APP. 643/2019, CM APPL. 29232/2019

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

16 paragraphs · 408 words
1.

An Appeal under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 has been filed on behalf of the Insurance Company to challenge the Award dated 12.04.2019, whereby the compensation in the sum of Rs.12,22,500/-, along with interest @ 9% per annum, has been granted to the Respondent No.1/ son of deceased Sh. Rameshwar Dayal Gupta, who was 76 years old at the time of his demise in the accident on 31.10.2017.

2.

The sole ground of challenge is that the deceased had only one claimant who is the married major son of the deceased. There is not an iota of evidence to show that he was financially dependent upon the deceased father. Moreover, the deceased was 76 years old and was getting a pension of Rs.29,813/- per month which cannot be considered as a case of Loss of Dependency or income to Respondent No.1; rather it can only be taken as a Loss of Estate for which 2/3rd deduction from the pension should have been made to calculate the quantum of compensation.

3.

Submissions heard and record perused.

4.

Indisputably, the deceased was 76 years old and father of Respondent No.1 the son who was major and there is nothing to reflect that he was financially dependent on the deceased. Yet at the same time, it cannot be over looked that the deceased was residing with this major son. The learned Tribunal has deducted 1/3rd from the monthly pension of Rs.29,813/-towards his own personal expenses. However, it cannot be overlooked as he was 76 years old man and it can be reasonably taken that he would have been spending a lot more amount on his own personal requirements and thus, the deduction towards the personal expenses should have been made to the extent of ½.

5.

The compensation towards Loss of Dependency is, therefore, recalculated as Rs.29183 – 14591 (50%) X 5 X 12 = Rs.8,75,490/-.

6.

The compensation has, therefore revised as under:

Sl. No.

Compensation awarded

under Head

Amount awarded by the TribunalAmount awarded by this Court
1.Loss of Dependency11,92,500/-8,75,490/-
2.Loss of Estate15,000/-Same
3.Funeral Charges15,000/-Same
TOTAL COMPENSATIONRs.12,22,500/-Rs.9,05,490/-

The compensation granted vide impugned Award is hereby modified and the total compensation granted is Rs.9,05,490/- along with interest @ 9% per annum as per the terms of the impugned Award dated 12.04.2019.

7.

The statutory amount deposited by the Insurance Company be refunded in accordance with law.

8.

The Appeal stands disposed of along with the pending application.