High CourtsDivision Bench(2020) 08 CAL CK 0010

Chitto Mondal @ Bashistha Mondal And Anr. vs State

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 10 August 2020

HON’BLE JUDGES
Bibek Chaudhuri, J · Soumen Sen, J
RESULT
Disposed Of
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Misc. Case (Bail Application) (CRM) No. 5353 Of 2020, Criminal Application No. 3670 Of 2020

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

10 paragraphs · 217 words

The petitioners undertake to affirm and stamp the petition as per the Rules within a month of resumption of normal functioning of the court. The

petition is taken up through video conference on the basis of such undertaking.

On perusal of the application for anticipatory bail as well as memo of evidence, it reveals that there was a free fighting between the two political

parties and on the basis of which the FIR was lodged. The injury report does not suggest any ingredient under Section 307 of the IPC. There is also no

material collected in support of the allegations under Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act and 3 /4 of the Explosives Substances Act.

Accordingly, the petitioners are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail and in the event of arrest, the petitioners be released on bail upon furnishing

a bond of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten thousand only) each, with one surety of like amount each, to the satisfaction of the arresting officer and also be

subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 438(2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. In case of the breach of any of the conditions,

the anticipatory bail shall automatically cancelled without any further reference to Court.

CRM 5353 of 2020 and CRAN 3670 of 2020 are disposed of.