High Courts(1891) 09 MAD CK 0015

Chithambaram Chetti vs Natesan Chetti and Another

Madras High Court · Decided on 2 September 1891 · Citation: (1896) 6 MLJ 616

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

7 paragraphs · 142 words
1.

Section 40 of Act II of 1864 directs that the court shall cause the proper process to be issued for putting the purchaser in possession. The

intention, which the language suggests, is S that the purchaser shall be placed in possession without being under the the necessity of instituting a suit

for that purpose. It'' the execution of ''4 the process is obstructed, the provision of the CPC became applicable. To hold otherwise would be to

defeat the intention of Section 40 of the Revenue Recovery Act, which gives a certificate the same force, which a decree of court has under the

Code of Civil Procedure.

2.

We set aside the order of the District Munsiff and direct that the petition be restored to the file and disposed of in accordance with law.

Counter-petitioner will pay the costs of this petition.