High CourtsDivision Bench(1910) 03 MAD CK 0006

Chinnasami Naidu vs Venkatasami Naidu

Madras High Court · Decided on 23 March 1910 · Citation: 6 Ind. Cas. 719

HON’BLE JUDGES
Ralph Benson, J · Krishnaswami Aiyar, J

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

5 paragraphs · 133 words
1.

The plaintiff sues upon a settlement of account. Looking at Exhibit B we can see no such settlement. It is not, however, signed. We are hot,

therefore, prepared to hold that the plaintiff has three years from its date for the institution of the suit. See Amuthu v. Muthayya 16 M. 339. Then it

is contended that the account is mutual, open and current. The Judge does not believe Exhibit A to be a correct extract. We are not in a position to

say that the Judge is wrong in saying from the nature of the entries that it is not a mutual, open, and current account. The claim as to Rs. 4-1-0

depends on the correctness of Exhibit A which the Judge denies. We must dismiss the second appeal with costs.