High Courts(1908) 03 CAL CK 0002

Charu Chandra Mitter and others vs Bhagirath Persad and others

Calcutta High Court · Decided on 16 March 1908

RESULT
Dismissed
CASE NUMBER
Appeal from Order No. 1060 of 1908

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

1 paragraphs · 119 words

Mitra and Caspersz, JJ.—We are of opinion that this appeal should have been presented with ad valorem Court-fees according to the decision in Akikunnissa Bibi v. Roop Lal ILR 25 Cal. 183(1897), That decision is consistent with the decision of a Full Bench of this Court with reference to proceedings in execution of mortgage-decrees and we cannot go against It. We are also of opinion that, in the present state of the law as administered in this Court, the Petitioner ought to have paid the ad valorem Court-fees on the value of the appeal. We allow the Petitioner to put in the ad valorem Court-fees within a week. If he fails to do so, the appeal will stand dismissed.