High CourtsSingle Bench(1953) 02 P&H CK 0009

Chande Ram Bashaku vs State

Punjab And Haryana At Chandigarh · Decided on 19 February 1953 · Citation: AIR 1953 P&H 263

HON’BLE JUDGES
Kapur, J
CASE NUMBER
Criminal Revision No. 898 of 1952

CourtKutchehry membership

More clarity. Every judgment.

Download court copies, explore connected cases and make more of every research session.

Loading membership options…

Ask AI about this case

AI Structured Summary

Not yet generated for this judgment

Judgment

3 paragraphs · 173 words

Kapur, J.—On a reference made by Din Mohammad J., a Division Bench of the Lahore High Court consisting of Young C. J. and Blacker J. held in -- ''Harnam Singh v. Emperor AIR 1939 Lah 295 (A), that the word "detains" in Section 498, Penal Code, implies some act on the part of the accused by which the woman's movements are restricted and this again implies unwillingness on her part and mere persuasion by means of blandishments or similar inducements is not included in the word "detention".

2.

In the present case the whole thing seems to be doubtful. It is not satisfactorily proved that the complainant was married to Mst. Lali, nor is it satisfactorily proved that there was detention by Chande Ram of the woman.

3.

In these circumstance's I am of the opinion that no case has been made out against the petitioner u/s 498, Penal Code. I, therefore, allow this petition, set aside the order of conviction and sentence passed on the petitioner, and the rule is made absolute.